Thoughts, articles, and updates on Text-to-CAD, AI CAD, and CAD in general.
TexoCAD comes from the Latin texo, "to weave" or "to compose," plus CAD. We built it after buying a 3D printer and realizing the hard part was not printing objects. It was turning ideas into geometry in the first place.
Vondy offers a browser-based AI CAD generator aimed at beginners. It's accessible, limited, and useful for exactly one thing: getting a non-CAD person to a simple STL fast.
Almost no text-to-CAD tool works offline. The models are too large, the inference too expensive, and the vendors need their API meters running. Here's the full picture.
Tolerances require GD&T knowledge, fit specifications, and manufacturing process awareness. Text-to-CAD tools produce nominal geometry and call it a day.
Engineering drawings require views, dimensions, tolerances, notes, title blocks, and revision history. Text-to-CAD can't generate any of that. The 3D model is only half the deliverable.
You're sending geometry descriptions to cloud APIs. Your prompts describe proprietary parts. The output passes through someone else's servers. Here's what you should know about data safety.
No. Not a single text-to-CAD tool generates actual assemblies with mates, constraints, and component relationships. You get individual parts. Assembly thinking is still your job.
Shapr3D built a genuinely good direct modeling tool for iPad and desktop. Their AI features are more cautious than most vendors, which might be the smartest thing they've done.
HP has been making noise about AI-assisted 3D printing workflows. Some of it connects to text-to-3D generation. Most of it is about print optimization, not design.
Generative design has been available for years now. Some tools matured. Some stayed in demo territory. Here's where every major option stands in 2026.
Newsletter
New articles, product updates, and practical ideas on Text-to-CAD, AI CAD, and CAD workflows.
